Description

The World Housing Encyclopedia (WHE) Report Database contains 130 reports on housing construction types in 43 seismically active countries. Each housing report is a detailed description of a housing type in a particular country. The description is prepared from a number of standard closed-ended questions and some narrative that have been provided by report authors. Each report has five major categories including architectural and structural features; Building Materials and Construction Process; Socio-economic Issues; Past Performance In Earthquakes, Seismic Features and Vulnerability; and Retrofit. All of the housing reports in this database have been contributed by volunteers. If you are interested in writing a housing report please contact the WHE Editorial Board.

About

The World Housing Encyclopedia (WHE) is a collection of resources related to housing construction practices in the seismically active areas of the world. The mission is to share experiences with different construction types and encourage the use of earthquake-resistant technologies worldwide. The technical activities of the WHE are steered by an international team of 22 professionals specializing in different aspects of seismic safety of buildings and structures. They bring relevant experience from 16 seismically active countries across the world. For more information about the World Housing Encyclopedia, visit http://www.world-housing.net/.

General Information

 

Report #:75
Building Type: Stone masonry apartment building
Country: Algeria
Author(s): Mohammed Farsi
Farah Lazzali
Yamina Ait-Mziane
Last Updated:
Regions Where Found: These stone masonry buildings exist throughout northern Algeria. In particular, the multi-story buildings exist mainly in the major cities e.g. Algiers, Oran, Constantine, Annaba, etc. This construction type may constitute 40 to 50% of the urban housing stock.
Summary:

Stone masonry building is typical multy-family residential construction found in ...

Length of time practiced: 101-200 years
Still Practiced: No
In practice as of: 1950
Building Occupancy: Mixed residential/commercial
Typical number of stories: 5
Terrain-Flat: Typically
Terrain-Sloped: Typically
Comments: This construction was practiced prior to 1950 by French contractors.It is the same construction type found in countries around


 

Features

 

 

Plan Shape Square, solidSquare, with an opening in planRectangular, solidRectangular, with an opening in planL-shapeTriangular, with an opening in planE-shapeU- or C-shapeIrregular plan shape
Additional comments on plan shape The building plan for this housing type can be of different forms: rectangular, L-shaped, U-shaped, etc. (see photos 1 and 2)
Typical plan length (meters) 25
Typical plan width (meters) 15
Typical story height (meters) 3.5
Type of Structural System Masonry: Stone Masonry Walls: Rubble stone (field stone) in mud/lime mortar or without mortar (usually with timber roof)Masonry: Stone Masonry Walls: Massive stone masonry (in lime/cement mortar)
Additional comments on structural system Lateral load-resisting system: The lateral load-resisting system consists of the stone masonry walls built in longitudinal and cross directions. Wall thickness varies from 400 to 600 mm. Low-strength mortar (either cement/sand or mud mortar) has been used. According to the Algerian Seismic Code (RPA99), this construction is permitted only if confined with reinforced concrete ties in vertical and horizontal direction, and with RC slabs used as floor and roof structures. The maximum building height allowed by the Code depends on the seismic zone (17 m, 14 m and 11 m, for seismic zones I, II and III, respectively).Gravity load-bearing system: Stone masonry walls are the principal elements of the gravity load-bearing structure.
Gravity load-bearing & lateral load-resisting systems The predominant structural system is composed of load bearing external stone masonry walls and wooden floors slabs. Thick external walls are distributed in both directions, however interior non-structural walls are thin and used to partitioning the space. In some cases, varied structural units (adobe, brick and stone) and systems are used resulting in variable wall strength and stiffness. Photos 03 & 04
Typical wall densities in direction 1 5-10%
Typical wall densities in direction 2 5-10%
Additional comments on typical wall densities The ratio of total wall area/plan area (for each floor) in each principal direction is between 5% and 6%.
Wall Openings The number, size and position of openings for a typical floor in a building are shown on the typical plan (Figure 3). The total window and door area is about 25% of the overall wall surface area.Openings are categorized according to their construction period and method; in some of them wooden lintels are used and in others the top of the opening is closed with a small vault.
Is it typical for buildings of this type to have common walls with adjacent buildings? No
Modifications of buildings Modifications are often undertaken by the residents without any professional assistance provided by engineers. They include demolition of interior walls, opening commercial areas, and vertical extensions.
Type of Foundation Shallow Foundation: Wall or column embedded in soil, without footingShallow Foundation: Rubble stone, fieldstone strip footing
Additional comments on foundation
Type of Floor System Other floor system
Additional comments on floor system Floor: vaulted masonry (bricks) supported by steel beams Floor and roof structures are not considered as rigid diaphragms.
Type of Roof System Roof system, other
Additional comments on roof system Timber: wood planks or beams that support clay tiles Floor and roof structures are not considered as rigid diaphragms.Photo 03
Additional comments section 2 Typical separation distance between buildings: 4-6 meters

 

Building Materials and Construction Process

 

 

Description of Building Materials


Structural Element Building Material (s)Comment (s)
Wall/Frame Wall: Field stone in cement or mud mortar Massive stones used at the corners and aroundthe openings
Foundations Field stone in cement or mud mortar
Floors Vaulted bricksand wooden frames
Roof Vaulted bricksand wooden frames
Other

Design Process


Who is involved with the design process? Architect
Roles of those involved in the design process Only architects had a role in the design/construction of this housing type
Expertise of those involved in the design process The level of expertise of all parties involved in the design and construction process was at the worldwide level of the 20th Century.

Construction Process


Who typically builds this construction type? Other
Roles of those involved in the building process Owners and contractors were involved in the construction of this type.This construction was practiced prior to 1950 by French contractors.
Expertise of those involved in building process The level of expertise of all parties involved in the design and construction process was at the worldwide level of the 20th Century.
Construction process and phasing The stone blocks were laid by hand and the basic construction equipment was used. This building type was typically constructed incrementally and so was not always designed for its final constructed size.
Construction issues

Building Codes and Standards


Is this construction type address by codes/standards? No
Applicable codes or standards
Process for building code enforcement Not applicable - building codes are not applicable to this construction practice.This construction type was used before the advent of seismic codes

Building Permits and Development Control Rules


Are building permits required? No
Is this typically informal construction? Yes
Is this construction typically authorized as per development control rules? No
Additional comments on building permits and development control rules This type of construction is permitted in seismic areas if resisting elements are added as extra strength reinforced concrete ties in vertical and horizontal directions.

Building Maintenance and Condition


Typical problems associated with this type of construction
Who typically maintains buildings of this type? Other
Additional comments on maintenance and building condition Problems with maintenance - most of this construction is in a lamentable state.

Construction Economics


Unit construction cost 10 000-15 000 Algerian Dinars /m.sq. (150-200 $US/m.sq.)
Labor requirements Information not available.
Additional comments section 3

 

Socio-Economic Issues

 

 

Patterns of occupancy In Algeria there is a serious housing crisis. On an average, there are two families occupying the same housing unit: the parents and a son's or daughter's family.
Number of inhabitants in a typical building of this construction type during the day 10-20
Number of inhabitants in a typical building of this construction type during the evening/night >20
Additional comments on number of inhabitants In most cases the women in the families are not working and stay at home during the day.
Economic level of inhabitants Low-income class (poor)
Additional comments on economic level of inhabitants Economic Level: For the Poor Class the ratio of Housing Price Unit to their Annual Income is 10:1.
Typical Source of Financing Owner financedPersonal savingsGovernment-owned housing
Additional comments on financing
Type of Ownership RentOwn outright
Additional comments on ownership
Is earthquake insurance for this construction type typically available? Yes
What does earthquake insurance typically cover/cost Earthquake insurance for all construction types is available since 2004 This insurance, known as CATNAT, was set up following the Boumerdes earthquake by the group of insurance companies. The insurance premium is assessed, for the moment, only on the seismic zone, the surface and the height of the construction. Since the begining of 2013, a working group was set up to reflect on the parameters to be taken into account for the evaluation of the premium
Are premium discounts or higher coverages available for seismically strengthened buildings or new buildings built to incorporate seismically resistant features? No
Additional comments on premium discounts
Additional comments section 4

 

Earthquakes

 

 

Past Earthquakes in the country which affected buildings of this type


YearEarthquake Epicenter Richter Magnitude Maximum Intensity
1980El-Asnam
1989Tipaza
1994Mascara
1999Ain-Tmouchent
2003Boumerdes
7.3X (MMI)
6.2VIII-IX (MSK)
5.6VIII (MSK)
5.8VIII (MSK)
6.8IX-X (MMI)

Past Earthquakes


Damage patterns observed in past earthquakes for this construction type Damage patterns vary from diagonal "X"-cracks to total wall collapse, and partial to total collapse of the roofs/slabs.The following damage patterns were also observed:- Horizontal cracks between walls and floors, - Vertical cracks at walls intersections, - Out of plane collapse of external walls, - Diagonal cracks in wall piers, - Partial or complete disintegration of walls, - Partial or complete collapse of the building
Additional comments on earthquake damage patterns Earthquake Total Number of Apartment Buildings (all types) Damage level (MSK scale) 1 2 3 4 5 1980 El-Asnam 4844439 1304 1351 863 8871989 Tipaza 4511 1480 1102 223 426 12801994 Mascara 1874 470 302 351 212 5391999 Ain-Tmouchent 3398 1062 606 684 528 518

Structural and Architectural Features for Seismic Resistance


The main reference publication used in developing the statements used in this table is FEMA 310 “Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings-A Pre-standard”, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 1998.

The total width of door and window openings in a wall is: For brick masonry construction in cement mortar : less than ½ of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For adobe masonry, stone masonry and brick masonry in mud mortar: less than 1/3 of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For precast concrete wall structures: less than 3/4 of the length of a perimeter wall.
Structural/Architectural Feature Statement Seismic Resistance
Lateral load pathThe structure contains a complete load path for seismic force effects from any horizontal direction that serves to transfer inertial forces from the building to the foundation.TRUE
Building Configuration-VerticalThe building is regular with regards to the elevation. (Specify in 5.4.1)FALSE
Building Configuration-HorizontalThe building is regular with regards to the plan. (Specify in 5.4.2)FALSE
Roof ConstructionThe roof diaphragm is considered to be rigid and it is expected that the roof structure will maintain its integrity, i.e. shape and form, during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area.FALSE
Floor ConstructionThe floor diaphragm(s) are considered to be rigid and it is expected that the floor structure(s) will maintain its integrity during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area.FALSE
Foundation PerformanceThere is no evidence of excessive foundation movement (e.g. settlement) that would affect the integrity or performance of the structure in an earthquake. TRUE
Wall and Frame Structures-RedundancyThe number of lines of walls or frames in each principal direction is greater than or equal to 2.TRUE
Wall ProportionsHeight-to-thickness ratio of the shear walls at each floor level is: Less than 25 (concrete walls); Less than 30 (reinforced masonry walls); Less than 13 (unreinforced masonry walls);TRUE
Foundation-Wall ConnectionVertical load-bearing elements (columns, walls) are attached to the foundations; concrete columns and walls are doweled into the foundation.TRUE
Wall-Roof ConnectionsExterior walls are anchored for out-of-plane seismic effects at each diaphragm level with metal anchors or straps. FALSE
Wall OpeningsTRUE
Quality of Building MaterialsQuality of building materials is considered to be adequate per the requirements of national codes and standards (an estimate). FALSE
Quality of WorkmanshipQuality of workmanship (based on visual inspection of a few typical buildings) is considered to be good (per local construction standards).FALSE
MaintenanceBuildings of this type are generally well maintained and there are no visible signs of deterioration of building elements (concrete, steel, timber).FALSE

Additional comments on structural and architectural features for seismic resistance In some cases, the use of these buildings changed.
Vertical irregularities typically found in this construction type Other
Horizontal irregularities typically found in this construction type Other
Seismic deficiency in walls - Poor mortar strength;- Walls not tied together;- varied structural units (adobe, brick and stone) and systems
Earthquake-resilient features in walls
Seismic deficiency in frames
Earthquake-resilient features in frame
Seismic deficiency in roof and floors -Not monolithic;-Not rigid in-plane;
Earthquake resilient features in roof and floors
Seismic deficiency in foundation
Earthquake-resilient features in foundation

Seismic Vulnerability Rating


For information about how seismic vulnerability ratings were selected see the Seismic Vulnerability Guidelines

High vulnerabilty Medium vulnerabilityLow vulnerability
ABCDEF
Seismic vulnerability class o

Additional comments section 5 Behavior of masonry buildings when subjected to seismic event is depending on how the walls and the floors are interconnected and anchored. In the majority of observed masonry buildings where the timber joist is not anchored to the masonry, walls tend to separate along their intersections causing vertical cracks.

Retrofit Information

 

 

Description of Seismic Strengthening Provisions


Structural Deficiency Seismic Strengthening
Cracks in the stone masonry walls - Cracks less than 0.3 mm width; by injection using fluid cement mortar- Large cracks: injection and adding stitching dog or steel bars; rebuilt using bricks or stones to bridge the crack zone in case of vertical crack; using metallic plate in case
Lack of integrity Addition of horizontal and vertical RC ties at exterior and steel ties in the interior, see Figure 7A

Additional comments on seismic strengthening provisions
Has seismic strengthening described in the above table been performed? These strengthening techniques were used to repair and strengthen the damaged buildings after the Algerian earthquakes reported in this contribution. A guide for using these seismic strengthening techniques is available in Algeria ("Mthodes de Rparation et de Renforcement des Ouvrages" was edited by CGS in 1992).
Was the work done as a mitigation effort on an undamaged building or as a repair following earthquake damages? Vulnerability studies for strategic buildings were done in 1996 at Algiers City, and some buildings of this type were strengthened as a result of the study.
Was the construction inspected in the same manner as new construction? No.
Who performed the construction: a contractor or owner/user? Was an architect or engineer involved? A contractor performed the construction and engineers were involved.
What has been the performance of retrofitted buildings of this type in subsequent earthquakes? Good.
Additional comments section 6

 

References

Benedetti D., Benzoni G., Parisi M.A. (1988). Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Evaluation for Old Urban Nuclei, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 16, 183-201.


Boutin, C., E. Ibraim, et S. Hans (1999). Auscultation de Btiments Rels en Vue de l'Estimation de la Vulnrabilit, Vme Colloque National PS "Gnie Parasismique et Rponse Dynamique des Ouvrages", ENS 3- 3- Cachan, 1, 298-305.


C. Boutin, S. Hans, E. Ibraim (2000). Pour une approche exprimentale de la vulnrabilit sismique, Revue franaise de gnie civil, vol 4 (6), pp. 682-714.


Coburn A.W., Spence R.J.S., Pomonis A. (1992). Factors Determining Casuality Levels in Earthquakes: Mortality Prediction in Building Collapse, 10th WCEE, Madrid, Spain.


Centre National de Recherche Applique en Gnie Parasismique (2000), Rgles Parasismiques Algriennes (RPA99), Alger, Algrie


Cochrane S.W., Schaad W.H. (1992). Assessment of Earthquake Vulnerability of Buildings, 10 WCEE, Madrid, Spain.


European Seismological Commission (1993). European Macroseismic Scale 1992, Grnthal G. Editor, Luxembourg.


Farsi M. N., Belazougui M. (1992). The Mont Chenoua (Algeria) earthquake of October 29th, 1989: Damage assessment and distribution, 10WCEE, Madrid, Spain.


Farsi M. N. (1996). Identification des Structures de Gnie Civil Partir de Leurs Rponses Vibratoires et Vulnrabilit du Bti Existant. Thse de Doctorat, Observatoire de Grenoble, LGIT, Universit Joseph Fourier.


Karnik V., Schenkova Z., Schenk V. (1984). Vulnerability and the MSK Scale, Engineering Geology, 20, 161-168.


Petrini V. (1995). Overview Report on Vulnerability Assessment, 5th ICSZ, Nice, France


Spence R.J.S., Coburn A.W., Pomonis A. (1992). Correlation of Ground Motion with Building Damage: The Definition of a New Damage-Based Seismic Intensity Scale, 10 WCEE, Madrid, Spain.


Tebbal F. (1985). Estimation Prliminaire du Risqu Sismique dans la Ville d'Alger, CTC.


Office National des Statistiques (ONS), recensement gnral de l'habitat et de la population, Algiers, 1998


M. Benblidia, J. R. Liu, Y. M. Xu, M. N. Farsi, M. Slimani & A.A. Chaker (1986). Etude de Vulnrabilit de la Ville de Djelfa, ANAT.


CGS (1992). "Mthodes de Rparation et de Renforcement des Ouvrages", Algeria.


Authors




Name Title Affiliation Location Email
Mohammed Farsi Head of Department CGS Kaddour Rahim St, BP 252, HUSSEIN-DEY, Algiers 16040 Algeria mnfarsi@cgs-dz.org, mnfarsi@gmail.com
Farah Lazzali Researcher CGS Kaddour Rahim St, BP 252, HUSSEIN-DEY, Algiers 16040 Algeria lazzalifarah@gmail.com
Yamina Ait-Mziane Researcher CGS Kaddour Rahim St, BP 252, HUSSEIN-DEY, Algiers 16040 Algeria

Reviewers


Name Title Affiliation Location Email
Marjana Lutman Research Engineer Slovenian National Building & Civil Engineering Ljubljana 1000, SLOVENIA marjana.lutman@zag.si